This is a copy of an article I wrote for Digital Times and appears in their latest edition.
*To view a larger version of any of the statistics below, simply click on the image*
On the week of the 26th April 2010, Largo Foods launched a new advertising campaign for their crisp brand, Hunky Dorys. The campaign which featured on billboards and bus stops, and had it’s own dedicated micro site, centered around images of girls in bikinis playing rugby, and was accompanied by suggestive tag lines, including “Are you staring at my crisps” and “Tackle these”. The images were shot in Miami by Walter Iooss Junior, a well-known photographer for Sports Illustrated. Within days, the campaign had caused controversy among the Irish public, with opinions divided on the campaign. O’Leary Analytics has looked at the coverage the campaign received in social media in Ireland and highlights some of the key results:
Day by Day:
It is very clear Hunky Dorys generated a lot of talk in social media in the weeks following the campaign launch, relative to where they started. For the days leading up to the launch, there was no mentions of the brand in social media in Ireland. Over the proceeding three weeks over 291 comments were made in a variety of social media outlets in Ireland mentioning the brand.
Social Media Types:
Message boards and forums, including boards.ie and electricpicnic.ie, saw the greatest concentration of social media mentions with 127 posts mentioning the brand. Twitter was second, followed by other media types (including news sources) and lastly blogs.
Gender Profile:
From a total of 291 comments, over 45% were written by men, 26% by women and in 29% of cases it was unknown.
Author Popularity:
The popularity rankings are based on a number of independent ranking systems including Technorati, Compete, Alexa and Quantcast. For Twitter, the number of followers, following and posts are taken into consideration when calculating popularity. Over 23% of those talking about the Hunky Dorys campaign had a popularity ranking of five (out of ten) or higher.
Sentiment:
Sentiment is calculated using an algorithm to look for positive or negative tone and in this sample, the results have been manually cross referenced for accuracy. Of the 82 mentions where sentiment is expressed, 48 are negative while 34 are positive.
Theme Graph:
The theme graph is created by analysing the content of the results from the search and is displayed in a cloud chart. This represents the main ideas of the conversations. The larger the word, the more often it appears in the content. On a positive note, the word “good” appeared 58 times, while “great” appeared 32 times. However, negative content appeared far more frequently. Words including “sexist” (58), “exploitation” (34), “horrendous” (25) and “offensive” (23) – and perhaps most worryingly from the brands point of view “rape” appeared 26 times.
Conclusion:
According to UTalkMarketing.com, the Hunky Dorys campaign cost approximately €500,000. However, following over 300 complaints to the Advertising Standards Authority of Ireland (ASAI) from members of the public, the advertising campaign was withdrawn only weeks after it was launched, and the microsite has also disappeared.
All of the statistics detailed above relate to coverage in social media in Ireland, but the campaign was reported on, and talked about, across the globe. While many may conclude that the campaign was a success, based on the amount of coverage it generated, the tone and sentiment analysis would suggest that much of the coverage was negative. It is impossible to argue that the Hunky Dorys brand profile hasn’t increased, both in Ireland and across the globe, and no where is this more clearly demonstrated than in the increased level of discussion in social media. However, the ultimate success or failure of this campaign, or any for that matter, will be calculated in the sales figures. According to this article from The Irish Independent there has been an increase in sales since the advertising campaign. Whether this growth can be sustained, remains to be seen.







Good article thanks, don’t see what difference this campaign and the same group of girls in bikinis selling something new every week in the Metro Herald. No one ever complains about them!
Given the media storm around the campaign, the absolute number of online comments is lower than expected but I believe that Stephen has restricted these to ones that definitely came from within Ireland. The social media analysis gives an excellent insight into the conversations taking place around Irish water coolers, bars and dinner tables in May.
The peaks reflect the initial campaign launch, the IRFU complaint, the campaign withdrawal and finally, the Belfast ladies rugby Hunky Dory protest.
Apart from the short term uplift in sales, the Meath Chronicle reported that Largo Foods are recruiting extra staff and running extra shifts, suggesting that they expect a longer term benefit. As with the Toyota recall, is this another case of there’s no such thing as bad publicity?
[...] Social media analysis of Hunky Dorys campaign shows some negative sentiment that was quite damaging. [...]
[...] I just found this article (via Damien Mulley) by O’Leary Analytics about Hunky Dory’s recent advertising campaign. [...]
hi Stephen, interesting stuff and nice site. I’ll be back here more often.
The role of advertising is to interrupt. Most ads don’t. They are forgotten within seconds. I’m not close to the brand, don’t know the team or anything, but Hunky Dory is a cheeky brand. I’d like to think that the ads appeal to the specific audience they are targeting. My mum probably would say negative things about say Lynx ads, but most teenage boys love their ads and the brand.
Sales in short term and long term matter most. The best ads invoke an emotional response. This did. And will surely lead to the brand getting better chance of staying top of mind, which improves chances of that purchase when in spar thinking of what crisps to buy.
I haven’t read the comments so could be completely off here, but from the general water cooler chat, I’d be happy enough if I were Largo.
[...] Stephen gave a really great synopsis of the recent Hunky Dorys campaign, which was entirely run offline but which exploded in the online forum. It was very interesting to see where the noise about these posters and the Hunky Dorys came from – you can see all of Stephen’s data here. [...]
Thanks for the comment Will, a lot of people have made the comparison between the Metro Herald campaigns and the Hunky Dorys adverts. I think one of the main differences is the location of the images – on billboards and posters rather than in newspapers, and another is the target audience. The girls in bikinis in the Metro tend not to be selling or promoting products that could be aimed at a younger audience.
Hi Brendan, thanks for the comment. The fact that Largo Foods are employing more people as a result of the increased sales surrounding the recent campaign is certainly a strong counter argument to those who disagreed with the campaign. As for there being no such thing as bad publicity, only time will truly tell. If the increase in sales can be maintained, then it may support that claim.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the comments, really glad you found the report of interest. You make a lot of valid points, and based on the increased sales figures, and extra staff being employed, I think you are right – Largo Foods must be pleased with the campaign.
I think the key point here may be the short and long term effects. If the short term negativity is replaced by a long term increase in sales (through greater brand awareness), it would be hard to argue that the campaign has not been success. On the flip side, if the increase in sales is just a blip, and in the long term sales slide again, the success or otherwise, of the campaign may need to be re-evaluated.
It is impossible to argue that brand awareness of Hunky Dorys hasn’t increased – for a few weeks, it was the brand everyone was talking about. What remains to be seen is whether this awareness is associated with a positive or negative view of the brand in the long term, and ultimately, how it performs in the Irish crisp market.
[...] Examining the fallout from the Hunky Dory campaign [...]
It come back to the audience.
If for example Largo know that teenager boys and young men are the people that eat most crisps – then what matters to Largo is how this bunch feel. They should care far less if parents or grandparents of these youths were unhappy with the ads.
My wife doesn’t consume enough crisps to be worth investing in. The task is too big for Largo to change all her life long views and buying behaviour about crisps. Largo execs should sleep easily at night safe in the knowledge that her views won’t change their sales a whole lot.
I, on the other hand, fancy myself a worthwhile target – although not bulleye target.
Why? Well, I’ve dedicated over 30 years of my life to eating crisps with my daily lunch. King Cheese and Onion is my favourite but I’ll occasionally dip into some Tayto or Hunky Dorys. It they could nudge their brand into my head and by doing so, nudge out say Tayto, they might get a few extra quid a week from me. So Largo should care about my views and hopefully my buying-crisp behaviour.
However, I eat fewer crisps than I did 20 years ago (and fewer full irish breakfasts too for similar reasons). My wife wouldn’t let me at any rate. But they should care more about my younger brother who eats about 4 times as many bags of crisps as I do. If he didn’t like the ads, that’s a problem.
Just my view. And I’ve no real idea if young men are the target. But hopefully Largo do.
Keep up the good work. Do let me know (via email or my blog) if I am completely wrong and this goes belly up for Largo.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for taking the time to write such a detailed comment. It’s very interesting to hear the views of someone who considers themselves part of the target market for the campaign. There has been a few updates since I published the report.
First up, the Advertising Standards Authority of Ireland (ASAI) upheld the complaints against Hunky Dorys.
Secondly, according to this article in The Irish Times, Hunky Dorys has gained 5 per cent volume growth from the rugby advert campaign.
If this 5% increase in sales covers the reported €500,000 spent on the advertising campaign, Largo must be happy.